# L1.4 Photons and the loss of determinism.

published on July 13, 2020

PROFESSOR: Determinism And it all begins with photons Einstein reluctantly came up with the idea that light was made of quanta– quanta of light called photons

Now when you think of photons, we think of a particle So everybody knew that light was a wave Maxwell's equations had been so successful Nevertheless, photoelectric effect– Planck's work– all were leading to the idea that, in some ways, photons were also particles

So when you think of a particle, however, there is an important difference between a particle in the sense of Newton, which is an object with zero size that carries energy and has a precise position and velocity at any time, and the quantum mechanical idea

Of particle, which is just some indivisible amount of energy or momentum that propagates So light was made of photons– packets of energy And a photon is a particle– a quantum mechanical particle Not in the sense that maybe it has position and velocity

Determined or it's a point particle, but more like a packet that is indivisible You cannot decompose it in further packets So Einstein realized that for a photon, the energy was given by h nu Where nu is the frequency of the light

That this photon is helping build up So if you have a beam of light, you should think it's billions of photons And according to the frequency of that light that is related to the wavelength– by the equation frequency times wavelength

Is velocity of light– you typically know, for light, the wavelength, and you know the frequency, and then you know the energy of each of the photons The photons have very, very little energy We have very, very little energy,

But your eyes are very good detectors of photons If you're in a totally dark room, your eye, probably, can take as little as five photons if they hit your retina So it's a pretty good detector of photons Anyway, the thing that I want to explain here

Is what happens if a beam of light hits a polarizer So what is a polarizer? It's a sheet of plastic or some material It has a preferential direction Let me align that preferential direction with the x-axis, and that's a polarizer

And if I send light that is linearly polarized along the x-axis, it all goes through If I send light linearly polarized along the y-axis, nothing goes through It all gets absorbed That's what a polarizer does for a living

In fact, if you send light in this direction, the light that comes out is identical to the light that came in The frequency doesn't change The wavelength doesn't change It's the same light, the same energy

So far, so good Now let's imagine that we send in light linearly polarized at some angle alpha So we send an electric field E alpha, which is E0 cosine alpha x hat plus E0 sine alpha y hat

Well, you've studied electromagnetism, and you know that this thing, basically, will come around and say, OK, you can go through because you're aligning the right direction, but you are orthogonal to my preferential direction, or orthogonal I absorbed, so this disappears

So after the polarizer, E is just E0 cosine alpha x hat That's all that is left after the polarizer Well here is something interesting– you know that the energy on electromagnetic field is proportional to the magnitude of the electric field

Square, that's what it is So the magnitude of this electric field– if you can notice, it's the square root of the sum of the squares will give you E0 as the magnitude of this full electric field But this electric field has magnitude E0 cosine alpha

So the fraction of power– fraction of energy through is cosine alpha squared The energy is always proportional to the square So the square of this is E0 squared cosine squared alpha And for this one, the magnitude of it is E0,

So you divide by E0 and cosine alpha is the right thing This is the fraction of the energy If alpha is equal to 0, you get cosine of 01 You get all the energy 1 If alpha is equal to pi over 2, the light is polarized along the y direction,

Nothing goes through– indeed, cosine of pi over 2 is 0, and nothing goes through So the fraction of energy that goes through is cosine squared alpha But now, think what this means for photons

What it means for photons is something extraordinarily strange And so strange that it's almost unbelievable that we get so easily in trouble Here is this light beam over here, and it's made up of photons

All identical photons, maybe billions of photons, but all identical And now, think of sending this light beam over there– a billion identical photons– you send them one by one into the state, and see what happens You know what has to happen, because classical behavior is

About right This fraction of the photons must go through, and 1 minus that must not go through You see, it cannot be there comes a photon and half of it goes through, because there's no such thing as half of it

If there would be half of it, it would be half the energy and, therefore, different color And we know that after a polarizer, the color doesn't change So here is the situation You're sending a billion photons and, say, one-third

Has to get through But now, the photos are identical How can that happen in classical physics? If you send identical photos, whatever happens to a photon will happen to all, but the photon either gets absorbed or goes through

And if it gets absorbed, then all should get absorbed And if it goes through, all should go through because they are all identical And now you have found a situation which identical set of experiments with identically prepared objects

Sometimes gives you different results It's a debacle It's a total disaster What seems to have happened here– you suddenly have identical photons, and sometimes they go through, and sometimes they

Don't go through And therefore, you've lost predictability It's so simple to show that if photons exist, you lose predictability And that's what drove Einstein crazy He knew when he entered these photons

That he was getting in trouble He was going to get in trouble with classical physics So possible ways out– people speculate about it– people said, well, yes, the photos are identical, but the polarizer has substructure

If it hits in this interatomic part, it goes through, and in that interatomic part, it doesn't go through People did experiments many times It's not true The polarizer is like that And then came a more outrageous proposition

By Einstein and others– that there are hidden variables You think the photons are identical, but a photon has a hidden variable– a property you don't know about If you knew that property about the photon,

You would be able to tell if it goes through or it doesn't go through But you don't know it, so that's why you're stuck with probabilities It's because the quantum theory is not complete There are hidden variables

And once you put the hidden variables, you'll discover the photon has more something inside it, and they are not the same, even though they look the same And that's a hidden variable theory And it sounds so philosophical that you would think, well, if you don't know about them, but they are there,

These properties, how could you ever know they are there? And the great progress of John Bell with the Bell inequalities is that he demonstrated that that would not fix the problem Quantum mechanics cannot be made deterministic with hidden variables It was an unbelievable result–

The result of John Bell So that's something we will advance towards in this course but not quite get there 805 discusses this subject in detail So at the end of the day, we've lost determinism We can only predict probabilities

So photons either gets through or not, and can only predict probabilities Now we write, in classical physics, a beam like that But how do we write the wave function of a photon? Well, this is quite interesting

We think of states of a particle as wave functions And I will call them, sometimes, states; I will call them, sometimes, wave functions; and I sometimes will call them vectors Why vector? Because the main thing you do with vectors

Is adding them or multiplying them by numbers to scale them And that's exactly what you can do with a linear equation So that's why people think of states, or wave functions, as vectors And Dirac invented a notation in which to describe a photon polarized in the x direction,

You would simply write something like this Photon colon x and this object– you think of it as some vector or wave function, and it represents a photon in the x direction And we're not saying yet what kind of vector this is, but it's some sort of vector

It's not just a symbol, it represents a vector And that's a possible state This is a photon polarized along x And you can also have, if you wish, a photon polarized along y And linearity means that if those photos can exist,

The superposition can exist So there can exist a state called cos alpha photon x plus sine alpha photon y, in which I've superposed one state with another– created a sum– and this I call the photon state polarized in the alpha direction

So this is how, in quantum mechanics, you think of this– photons– we will elaborate that and compare with this equation It's kind of interesting What you lose here is this ease There's no ease there because it's one photon When you have a big electric field,

I don't know how many photons there are I would have to calculate the energy of this beam and find the frequency that I didn't specify, and see how many photons But each photon in this beam quantum mechanically can be represented as this superposition

And we'll talk more about this superposition now because our next subject is superpositions and how unusual they are Well the hidden variable explanation failed because Bell was very clever,

And he noted that you could design an experiment in which the hidden variables would imply that some measurements would satisfy an inequality If the existed hidden variables and the world was after all classical, the results of experiments would satisfy a Bell inequality

And then a few years later, the technology was good enough that people could test the Bell inequality with an experiment, and they figured out it didn't hold So the hidden variables lead to Bell inequalities that are experimentally shown not to hold

And we will touch a little bit on it when we get to untangle them After the polarizer, the photon is in the state photon x It's always polarized along the x direction, so it's kind of similar that this doesn't go through This goes through, but at the end of the day,

As we will explain very soon, the cosine alpha is not relevant here When it goes through, the whole photon goes through So there's no need for a cosine alpha So that's what goes out of the polarizer

## Related Videos

PROFESSOR: Square well. So what is this problem? This is the problem of having a particle that can actually just move on a segment, like it can move on this er...
PROFESSOR: Last time we talked about particle on a circle. Today the whole lecture is going to be developed to solving Schrodinger's equation. This is very...
BARTON ZWIEBACH: --that has served, also, our first example of solving the Schrodinger equation. Last time, I showed you a particle in a circle. And we wrote th...
PROFESSOR: Would solving this equation for some potential, and since h is Hermitian, we found the results that we mentioned last time. That is the eigenfunction...
PROFESSOR: How about the expectation value of the Hamiltonian in a stationary state? You would imagine, somehow it has to do with energy ion states and energy....
PROFESSOR: We start with the stationary states. In fact, stationary states are going to keep us quite busy for probably a couple of weeks. Because it's a p...
PROFESSOR: This definition in which the uncertainty of the permission operator Q in the state psi. It's always important to have a state associated with me...
PROFESSOR: Uncertainty. When you talk about random variables, random variable Q, we've said that it has values Q1 up to, say, Qn, and probabilities P1 up ...
PROFESSOR: Let me do a little exercise using still this manipulation. And I'll confirm the way we think about expectations values. So, suppose exercise. ....
PROFESSOR: That brings us to claim number four, which is perhaps the most important one. I may have said it already.b The eigenfunctions of Q form a set of bas...
PROFESSOR: So here comes the point that this quite fabulous about Hermitian operators. Here is the thing that it really should impress you. It's the fact t...
PROFESSOR: Today we'll talk about observables and Hermitian operators. So we've said that an operator, Q, is Hermitian in the language that we've ...
PROFESSOR: It's a statement about the time dependence of the expectation values. It's a pretty fundamental theorem. So here it goes. You have d dt of ...
PROFESSOR: Expectation values of operators. So this is, in a sense, one of our first steps that we're going to take towards the interpretation of quantum ...
PROFESSOR: We got here finally in terms of position and in terms of momentum. So this was not an accident that it worked for position and wave number. It works...
PROFESSOR: What we want to understand now is really about momentum space. So we can ask the following question-- what happens to the normalization condition tha...
BARTON ZWIEBACH: Today's subject is momentum space. We're going to kind of discover the relevance of momentum space. We've been working with wave f...
PROFESSOR: Time evolution of a free particle wave packet. So, suppose you know psi of x and 0. Suppose you know psi of x and 0. So what do you do next, if you...
PROFESSOR: We'll begin by discussing the wave packets and uncertainty. So it's our first look into this Heisenberg uncertainty relationships. And to be...
Three-dimensional case. Now, in the future homework, you will be doing the equivalent of this calculation here with the Laplacians-- it's not complicated--...